<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Galaxy Surveys |</title><link>https://gerrfarr.github.io/tags/galaxy-surveys/</link><atom:link href="https://gerrfarr.github.io/tags/galaxy-surveys/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Galaxy Surveys</description><generator>HugoBlox Kit (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>H₀ from the matter–radiation equality scale</title><link>https://gerrfarr.github.io/projects/h0-from-equality-scale/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gerrfarr.github.io/projects/h0-from-equality-scale/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The &amp;ldquo;Hubble tension&amp;rdquo; — the disagreement between local measurements of the Universe&amp;rsquo;s expansion rate, $H_0$, and the value inferred from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and galaxy surveys through observations of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) — has been one of cosmology&amp;rsquo;s most discussed open puzzles. $H_0$ measurements from the CMB and BAO, while done at very different epochs, share a calibration: the scale of the &lt;strong&gt;sound horizon&lt;/strong&gt; at recombination, which depends on early-universe physics. If the tension reflects something missing in our early-universe model, those measurements all move together.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This project develops an &lt;strong&gt;independent route&lt;/strong&gt; to $H_0$ from galaxy surveys that does not rely on the sound horizon at all. It uses the &lt;strong&gt;matter–radiation equality scale&lt;/strong&gt; — a different feature imprinted in the matter power spectrum — as a standard ruler.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="what-weve-shown"&gt;What we&amp;rsquo;ve shown&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In a paper led by Oliver Philcox (
, Phys. Rev. D 2020) we applied a preliminary version of our new methodology to galaxy clustering data from BOSS.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
(arXiv:2112.10749, Phys. Rev. D 2022) — I further refined the method and led forecasts showing that upcoming spectroscopic galaxy surveys (DESI, Euclid, MegaMapper) can deliver sub-percent precision on $H_0$ from the equality scale alone.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Philcox, Farren, Sherwin, Baxter &amp;amp; Brout (
, Phys. Rev. D 2022) — combining galaxy surveys, CMB lensing, and Type-Ia supernovae to deliver a &lt;strong&gt;3.6% sound-horizon-independent constraint&lt;/strong&gt; on $H_0$.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The result is an alternative angle on the Hubble tension that future high-redshift spectroscopic data will sharpen further.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="where-it-has-been-applied"&gt;Where it has been applied&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The method we developed has since been picked up across the field and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) recently reported new percent-level constraints on $H_0$, independent of the sound horizon (Zaborowski et al.
, JCAP 2025 &amp;amp;
, JCAP 2026).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Determining the Hubble constant without the sound horizon: Perspectives with future galaxy surveys</title><link>https://gerrfarr.github.io/publications/farren-2021-grl/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gerrfarr.github.io/publications/farren-2021-grl/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Forecasts showing that upcoming spectroscopic galaxy surveys (DESI, Euclid, MegaMapper) can deliver sub-percent precision on $H_0$ from the matter–radiation equality scale, independent of the sound horizon. See the
project for the broader program.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>